Wednesday, December 12, 2007



Speculation on a possible tablet from Apple is constantly circulating. However, I had not seen a truly compelling reason for them to make one... until Dell announced their foray into the tablet space (http://www.gottabemobile.com/DellOfficiallyLaunchesXTTabletPC.aspx).

Dell's first offering sports a capacitive touchscreen, like Apple's iPhone. Only problem is they don't have the software to back it up. The hardware can register multiple points of contact but they don't have the software ready to take advantage of it. Apple, however, does have the software to use multi-touch and it's not just on the iPhone; it's on the Mac.

The touchpad on the Macbook recognizes multiple points of contact. Two fingers sliding over the pad is recognized as page scrolling. Zooming in and out on Google Maps can be done with pinch gestures (http://jkontherun.blogs.com/jkontherun/2007/04/touch_in_contex.html), same as on the iPhone.

Does this mean Mac OS X is as multi-touch capable as the iPhone? No, but some functionality is there, and it would not be tough to port over (or simply activate?) the rest. Regardless, Macs support multi-touch.

So, with Dell rolling out multi-touch capable hardware without software support, it seems an ideal time for Apple to give them a sucker punch with a tablet of their own with multi-touch software.



CateGoogles: Tablet_PC
Mood = curious

Labels:

Will Apple roll out a tablet to spite Dell?


3 Comments:

  1. "To spite dell?" I hope so : ) I like the idea of Mac introducing anything of touchscreen and tablet technology. Whatever Apple is doing, Times, Newsweek, NY Times, and WSJ will advertise their products. It will be good for expansion of our beloved tablet technology : ) Don't you think?

    By Blogger Unknown, at 12/13/2007 02:07:00 PM
     

  2. I think extrapolating multitouch in the track pad to the level needed in full OS interactions is kind of a stretch. If that's the case, Vista already has multitouch as well

    http://channel9.msdn.com/Showpost.aspx?postid=266221

    I think a more compelling view is that Microsoft has a full multitouch implementation on the way using nothing more than WPF and .net, two technologies already standard in Vista.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 12/14/2007 03:25:00 PM
     

  3. chun shun: Yep, sure would be nice.

    antimatter: Is multipoint in Vista? Looks like it's still in development. As for making multi-touch work in the OS, Mac OS X recognizes the difference between one touch and two. Now it's just a matter of determining what each gesture does. Registering a two-finger tap as a right-click would be simple to implement, yet provide very useful functionality.

    By Blogger Sumocat, at 12/14/2007 07:47:00 PM
     

Post a Comment

<< Home




Archive

  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • October 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • January 2013
  • August 2012
  • June 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • December 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005