data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfa53/dfa53cac36ce73b9f8337f242051ccf456527ff6" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9590/d959080ea1a517fdf092ca477d6287f24777ece9" alt=""
I understand the strength of the free press lies in its commitment to present the plain facts, but I think a little "red-eye removal" would be fine given the red-eye was caused by the flash from the newsperson's camera. Also, there is something slightly misleading about reporting how someone is "slightly contaminated" by radiation and showing a photo of that person with glowing eyes. | ![]()
|
1 Comments:
Also, there is something about saying "slightly contaminated." It's akin to saying, "She is slightly pregnant." You either are or you're not :) They should say, "She has low dosage levels"
Nice pic :)
By
Anonymous, at 12/02/2006 04:06:00 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home