Wednesday, November 21, 2007



Okay, even though I see great potential (http://sumocat.blogspot.com/2007/11/why-amazons-kindle-should-succeed.html) for Amazon's Kindle (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kindle) electronic book reader, I must wonder if it can, or if it's even possible, to overcome the perception of books as property and convince people to think of them as data to be accessed.

The Amazon folks have been very deliberate in their effort to describe Kindle as a service, not a device. The physical product is a device, but it's a medium to access data. That access is what they're selling.

Likewise, when you buy a book for the Kindle, you're actually buying the right to read that book. The data resides primarily on Amazon's server and temporarily on the Kindle for access. On the plus side, you can't lose the books. If your Kindle is destroyed, you can buy another to regain access to all your books.

However, barring loss or destruction, books do last a long time and are freely transferable. Your rights to Kindle ebooks have an undetermined lifespan and are non-transferable. If Amazon loses the right to distribute a book, you could lose the right to read it, since the data resides primarily on their server. When you're done with a book, you can't give it to someone else.

Understanding and accepting these differences will be difficult for many people. However, I'm sure there is also a good number who will embrace the shift. But I think this shift in thinking, more than its price or unattractiveness, is the major obstacle to its success.



CateGoogles: mobile_tech
Mood = concerned

Labels:

Why Amazon's Kindle could fail


0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home




    Archive

    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • October 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • April 2013
    • January 2013
    • August 2012
    • June 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • December 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • February 2007
    • January 2007
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
    • July 2006
    • June 2006
    • May 2006
    • April 2006
    • March 2006
    • February 2006
    • January 2006
    • December 2005
    • November 2005
    • October 2005
    • September 2005
    • August 2005
    • July 2005