Wednesday, April 04, 2007



Steve Jobs is a friggin' genius. Yeah, most people already know that, but to really appreciate it, one must understand the process. In the case of the recent announcement that the iTunes Store will start to offer music free of digital rights management (http://tinyurl.com/2gtxv6), that process starts with the initial offering of 99¢ songs.

For a long time, Jobs held a hard line at 99¢ (http://tinyurl.com/yweel2) for song price, despite pressure from music labels to raise prices and claims that iTunes wasn't profitable at that price point (not that it needed to make a profit since its purpose was to drive iPod sales). Now we see the price fix also served as his secret weapon for lifting DRM restrictions; the labels drop DRM, Jobs raises the price cap to $1.29 per song.

It is also important to note that this higher price only affects singles. Album prices are unchanged. This too benefits the labels because the better price per song makes them more attractive purchases, and the industry desperately wants to boost album sales. So the higher price on singles is a double-win for the labels.

But what about us lowly consumers? Is being DRM-free worth the 30% price hike? Perhaps not, but Jobs didn't stop there. The DRM-free, higher priced songs are also of higher quality - 256 kbps vs the original 128 kbps. That's CD quality! Not a bad deal. Surely, this was another perk held in reserve to sweeten the pot for us consumers. And it applies to albums, which are not going up in price. Quite a nice compromise.

For Apple, this deal lifts a huge weight off their shoulders in regards to anti-trust lawsuits. By selling music that is compatible with most digital music players, they wipe out accusations that their iPod + iTunes combo is monopolous in regards to music. Good way to settle that dispute.

Finally, this deal puts iTunes ahead of the competition. There is now serious pressure to offer better quality with no DRM and, in the case of albums, with no price hike. The extra bandwidth cost doesn't hurt Apple since they make their money on the hardware. The other guys don't. And no one in their right mind would believe this move makes the iPod appear less attractive.

Currently, the only music label signed up for the deal is EMI, but others will follow. The lure of the higher price on singles and greater incentive to buy albums is too good for them to resist. Hopefully, this deal sees much success, and leads to a great decline in music DRM. Now about video...



CateGoogles: general_tech
Mood = excited

Labels:

Jobs' DRM-free scheme unfolds


0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home




    Archive

    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • October 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • April 2013
    • January 2013
    • August 2012
    • June 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • December 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • February 2007
    • January 2007
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
    • July 2006
    • June 2006
    • May 2006
    • April 2006
    • March 2006
    • February 2006
    • January 2006
    • December 2005
    • November 2005
    • October 2005
    • September 2005
    • August 2005
    • July 2005