Saturday, March 10, 2007



As much as I despise the usual business at the Bush white House, I'm not an irrational W-hater who refuses to give credit when it's due (though it happens very rarely).

Anyway, the White House has approved funding (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070308/ap_on_hi_te/flexible_solar_cells_1) for Konarka Technologies (http://www.konarka.com/), a company focused on mobile and portable solar power solutions. They envision placing their broad spectrum solar cells in a wide range of devices. Can't wait to start seeing them in tablets.



CateGoogles: mobile_tech
Mood = excited

Labels:

Bush backs solar


3 Comments:

  1. What sort of future does solar have, anyway?

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 3/10/2007 11:06:00 PM
     

  2. Solar is the future. The sun is literally the engine of the solar system. All the energy in the planet is a speck of dust compared to the mountain of power the sun releases daily. Eventually, we will get most of our power from it, and the sooner we get serious about that goal, the better.

    By Blogger Sumocat, at 3/11/2007 09:48:00 AM
     

  3. movpttSumocat hit it on the nail! If negative-thinking people controlled research, experimentation and development last century we'd still hear people saying "Man was never met to fly - it can't be done". Alexander Graham Bell offered to sell Western Union (a telegraph company back then) the patent to the telehphone but the Western Union president juat laughed at the idea saying the telephone was just a toy and had no serious future.

    I have learned to disassociate myself from negative thinkers and nay-sayers when it comes to freeing this world from the grips of the oil industry. And if you look at the source of the negative comments it is usually someone that benefits from fossil fuels and/or nuclear energy - or they are just ignorant of technology.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 3/11/2007 06:53:00 PM
     

Post a Comment

<< Home




Archive

  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • October 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • January 2013
  • August 2012
  • June 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • December 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005