Friday, April 13, 2007



Look, I find death threats (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6499095.stm) as abhorrent as the next guy does (assuming the next guy is not Osama bin Laden), but all this noise about blog etiquette and a code of conduct (http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2007/04/draft_bloggers_1.html) for blogging makes me wonder if the guys backing these ideas have forgotten that blogs exist on the INTERNET!!! (http://sumocat.blogspot.com/2006/10/blogs-and-integrity.html)

Like a tasty breakfast, the information superhighway is artery-clogged with porn and spam. Either accept it or get off the road, but don't add to the mess with your delusions of grandeur, thinking you can purify the virtual world like cyber-saviors handing down rules of the road from Mount Sinai. You want to hand out badges? Forget that -- I don't need no stinking badges!

What? Too many mixed metaphors? Okay, bottom line: a blog is just an easily updated website; a blogger is a dude or chick who maintains such a site; the title of "blogger" is nothing special. Get over yourselves.

By contrast, the title of "ink blogger" (http://sumocat.blogspot.com/search?q=%22ink+blogger%22) is very special because A) few individuals have earned this distinction and B) we post in our own handwriting, ensuring our blogs are uniquely our own. Perhaps we should have our own code... yes, an ink blogger's code of conduct... (http://tinyurl.com/2382s9)



CateGoogles: Ink Blogging
aimless_musing
Mood = curious

Labels: ,

You do know blogs are on the Internet, right?


4 Comments:

  1. Agreed! We don't need their salvation.

    Do I get to belong to the group of ink bloggers even though I've posted a lot of text blogs recently? I promise to start posting more in Ink as soon as finals are over.

    LOL. Its great to hear you speaking about this by the way. I too refuse to sign any code of conduct. I don't take myself that seriously, so why should I take anyone choosing to vocalize threats via internet?

    -Minda-

    By Blogger Reading Wolf, at 4/14/2007 01:21:00 AM
     

  2. No frequency requirements for ink blogging as far as I'm concerned just so long as the inking is fun. BTW, there is a bit of irony in that you and I, who can post in our own handwriting, will not *sign* a code of conduct. I may carry that idea a bit further.

    By Blogger Sumocat, at 4/14/2007 09:04:00 AM
     

  3. The biggest reason behind me not agreeing with it is because I am not about to change my style to suit others. My blog is my place to vent sometimes, my place to store crazy information (like the hollow earth theory), and my place to interact with other people. I don't like having rules set forth to govern my behavior. I will be looking at a future with nothing but rules and regulations once I become a teacher. I'll have to hide my blog behind a different picture and not let any of my students know about it. Basically, I will have to censor my whole life. Not to mention my MySpace will have to go. Life isn't about rules and regulations, its about learning from experiences. And if it takes someone calling me a offensive comment to teach me something. I will accept that. Although I would probably block them first and really think about the reason they went off later. But thats just the hippie side of me. :D

    By Blogger Reading Wolf, at 4/17/2007 03:01:00 AM
     

  4. Certainly you have good reason not to sign on. Having been a tutor, I know it is best not to let your real life and your teaching life mingle.

    I, on the other hand, am simply an anti-conformist. Even when I join a crowd, I must march out of step, as demonstrated with the blog. Yes, I blog but clearly not like everyone else. :)

    By Blogger Sumocat, at 4/17/2007 09:31:00 AM
     

Post a Comment

<< Home




Archive

  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • October 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • January 2013
  • August 2012
  • June 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • December 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005