Tuesday, September 12, 2006


Conflict: consumers don't want to download movies if they can't watch them on their TV sets, but movie studios will not allow downloaded content to be burned to DVD, the common digital movie medium. What to do?

If you're Amazon (http://tinyurl.com/klggu), you offer movie downloads and hope people won't care about viewing them on TV. But if you're Apple (http://tinyurl.com/hmxq6), you offer a hardware solution. Sure enough, that's what they did to day when they announced their movie download service.

Sure, there are other ways to play computer or iPod content on your TV, but your average consumer doesn't want to deal with third party equipment for what will be seen as a primary use. Plus, they want something as simple to use as, well, an iPod (http://www.apple.com/itunes/). Odds are that Apple's new iTV (http://tinyurl.com/ku5c4) device will deliver that same ease of use.

But more to the point, Apple's announcement today is the first demonstration of Steve Jobs' new power. The iPod commands its market space because Apple controls its hardware, software and delivery of content. In any one of those areas, other companies can match and even surpass Apple. But no one can match them in all three, much less match their ability to make all three work together.

and now that Steve Jobs is the largest individual shareholder of Disney (http://tinyurl.com/epocs), he now has a hand in the core element of any media system: content. Forget everyone else, Jobs brings assurance that Disney will be on board for any future Apple offerings. Apple now offers the total package, and they offer it beautifully. The Zune (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Zune)'s going to need a lot more than wifi to make a dent in this system, especially since the iTV unit will use wifi. Any doubt that the next iPod will too?




Mood = bemused

Analyzing the Apple Advantage


0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home




    Archive

    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • October 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • April 2013
    • January 2013
    • August 2012
    • June 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • December 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • February 2007
    • January 2007
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
    • July 2006
    • June 2006
    • May 2006
    • April 2006
    • March 2006
    • February 2006
    • January 2006
    • December 2005
    • November 2005
    • October 2005
    • September 2005
    • August 2005
    • July 2005