Friday, March 07, 2008

[+/-] Hide/Show Text

Labels:

iPhone SDK: Brutal but not lethal


6 Comments:

  1. I agree with you. But I only hope that this urges Nokia (since Microsoft appears to have its hands in too many pots) to quickly counter this move. I actually think they're closer than Apple since they already have experience in the MID scene, but maybe with marketing and a little OCD, they'll play up more towards HID's/Nid's.

    By Blogger archiwiz, at 3/09/2008 10:06:00 PM
     

  2. We also agree that Nokia is the major competitor here. They are often overlooked since they lack a strong presence in the States, but they have the hardware experience to offer a real alternative to Apple. However, I've stated a few times that their weakness is their lack of computer experience. Nokia's devices are easily as good or better than Apple's, but as handhelds get more powerful, the edge will inexorably shift to the computer maker.

    By Blogger Sumocat, at 3/09/2008 10:25:00 PM
     

  3. I would take Intel out of the firing line.

    Apple likes Intel now, and is no doubt eager to use their new processors in future iPhones and the so-called Safari-pad/tablet that is speculated.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 3/12/2008 12:20:00 PM
     

  4. Intel put themselves in the firing line with their Mobile Internet Device (MID) program. True, the MID is more directly competitive with the iPod Touch than the iPhone, but the SDK situation applies to both devices. That said, I suppose it would be more accurate to say Intel *is putting* themselves in the firing line since the fruits of their program haven't actually been marketed yet.

    By Blogger Sumocat, at 3/12/2008 12:37:00 PM
     

  5. Intel has traditionally come up with lots of ideas for products. Remember embedded audio processing back in the day on a 386!

    Every year they come out with new platforms and new product ideas and categories.

    Some get further along than others. Some succeed, some don't. But intel does try to 'control' their future by building demand.

    Nobody, intel or otherwise is going to push Jobs & co to come out with a new product directly. But if intel can push the MID's and UMPC's and such and get within striking distance of sucess, Apple will come in an make the category their own.

    And use Intel processors and chipsets in the process.

    Besides, I don't think intel is taking too much of a financial risk on MIDs versus the actual companies that will make/market them.

    They just want to orders for processors and keep the factories humming.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 3/12/2008 02:26:00 PM
     

  6. Okay, but I don't understand how any of that makes Intel *not* a player in this game. It's possible Intel's MID program will be DOA, but as of now, they are still pushing forward with it, and I think it reasonable to assume they will put up some resistance to Apple's dominance of the mobile Internet field. That said, I think they're the least of Apple's competition, and it would not surprise me if they stepped out early.

    By Blogger Sumocat, at 3/12/2008 02:52:00 PM
     

Post a Comment

<< Home




Archive

  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • October 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • January 2013
  • August 2012
  • June 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • December 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005