Tuesday, December 19, 2006



Trying to catch up with all the stuff I missed, so in no particular order, I think I'll start with TIME Magazine's disingenuous naming of "You" as their Person of the Year (http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1569514,00.html). First, they're lying to most of "You". Read the background and it's apparent they are only referring to the small segment of the population that engages in social interaction on the Internet. Most of "You" who read their magazine do not fit their criteria of "You". And by "You", I mean people other than you, since you are obviously reading this on the Internet. TIME, however, boasts a large offline readership, including many who do not participate in the activities that made "You" Person of the Year. This also excludes the even larger number of "You" who lack the time, resources, and/or knowledge to access the Internet at all.

Second, if you realize that "You" refers to a privileged minority who can afford such things as computers and cameraphones and time to spend on the Internet, you must recognize that "You" are not part of a digital democracy, but of an online aristocracy. This is not a judgment, merely a clarification, a reality check to keep us from sliding into a delusion of grandeur.

Have we uncovered a reasonable solution to the conflict in Iraq? Have we stopped the killings in Darfur? Have we done anything other than entertain each other using the newfound power of Web 2.0? The answer right now is "no". But that doesn't mean it has to remain "no".

TIME may have been premature in naming "You" Person of the Year, but they may yet prove to be correct if we recognize their honor for what it is: a prediction. "You" are the aristocracy leading a new revolution, much the way the Founding Fathers led the American Revolution. Like those leaders, "You" are numerous, but "You" are not the majority. Only after the masses are brought into the fold can the revolution truly begin. Then perhaps we can honestly claim "You" are worthy of being recognized as Person of the Year.



CateGoogles: aimless_musing
Mood = skeptical

TIME's Person of a Later Year


1 Comments:

  1. Nice.

    Timbo

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 12/19/2006 10:20:00 PM
     

Post a Comment

<< Home




Archive

  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • October 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • January 2013
  • August 2012
  • June 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • December 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005