Wednesday, April 21, 2010

[+/-] Hide/Show Text

Labels:

Dear RNC: Thanks for the Survey, Go F Yourselves


12 Comments:

  1. Doesn't the Democratic party do the same thing? Leading questions, etc.?

    By Blogger Unknown, at 4/23/2010 07:03:00 PM
     

  2. If they do, they've never sent one to us.

    By Blogger Sumocat, at 4/23/2010 07:04:00 PM
     

  3. They have to me. I have gotten leading question surveys from both.

    By Blogger Unknown, at 4/23/2010 07:16:00 PM
     

  4. If you knew the answer, why'd you ask the question? Oh wait, that was a leading question. So clever.

    By Blogger Sumocat, at 4/23/2010 07:19:00 PM
     

  5. It was what we in the educated set call a "rhetorical question", so thanks for confirming where you fall!

    By Blogger Unknown, at 4/23/2010 07:45:00 PM
     

  6. "A rhetorical question is a figure of speech in the form of a question posed for its persuasive effect without the expectation of a reply." -- So Mr. Educated, are you telling me you did not expect a reply to your persuasive, or leading, question? If so, why do you continue to draw out this exchange? Surely, you would not still be here if you did not expect a reply. Or are you in the "educated set" unfamiliar with the meaning of the words you are using?

    By Blogger Sumocat, at 4/23/2010 08:05:00 PM
     

  7. Yep, that is right, I did not expected a reply. I just assumed that you knew that both parties followed the same script to pull the $. Sorry I assumed that you would know that!

    By Blogger Unknown, at 4/23/2010 08:31:00 PM
     

  8. And yet you're still here plugging away, continuing to prove yourself wrong. It must infuriate you to no end that an uneducated slob like me is schooling you on the definition of words you think you know, showing you how rhetorical questions are actually posed, and causing you to mistype. Sorry, you're already wrong and going elitist doesn't make you look any less wrong.

    By Blogger Sumocat, at 4/23/2010 08:43:00 PM
     

  9. Sorry Sumocat, you can try to divert the issue all you want but it is true that both parties pull this same crap to get people to agree to whatever they want you to agree to. That's why people need to be very careful how they interpret any results to any survey.

    By Anonymous Nick, at 4/28/2010 02:44:00 PM
     

  10. A) I never claimed they didn't.
    B) Neither you nor David think you need proof to back your claims.

    See, I don't mind being proven wrong, but that requires, you know, proof, like the RNC push poll in my possession.

    For example, by providing the definition of a rhetorical question and demonstrating that his leading question did not fit the criteria, I proved that David's claim that he'd presented a rhetorical question was wrong, or at least that his execution was flawed. Had I simply shot back without support that his question was not rhetorical, then I'd just be a jackass making hollow claims.

    By Blogger Sumocat, at 4/28/2010 03:20:00 PM
     

  11. Well the real issue being discussed here was the question of whether or not both political parties use leading questions and questionable methods to draw support. Instead of addressing that issue you used a common internet, and political, tactic: you changed the subject. And now you have moved onto another popular chat room argument technique: name calling. I realize that David started it first, but that doesn't mean that you should do it too.

    Back to the real issue. Yes, it is despicable that this survey was produced and I most certainly don't support the practice. However, anyone how has followed any politics at all knows that both sides use misleading questions and scare tactics to push their cause. I hope that you are not such a blind supporter of a political party to ignore the fact that both parties are corrupt in their own ways.

    As for your "proof" I would say that the survey is much more of an example than any kind of definitive proof. Here is an example of democrats preparing the same kind of leading questions: http://www.everypolitics.com/2010/01/07/dccc-priorites/ The only real difference is that they were smarter about it and didn't make it so stupidly obvious.

    By Anonymous Nick, at 4/29/2010 12:54:00 AM
     

  12. Again, I didn't dispute whether the Democrats asked leading questions, so there was no discussion. My only problem with David is that he failed to provide an intelligent counterpoint. I don't waste time arguing points I'm not making.

    Meanwhile you've found a leaning questionaire posted online by the DCCC that appears not to have included aspersions cast on the other party, or at least none were reported. That's a left-leaning survey on a Democratic site vs a negative push poll mailed to people's homes with explicit instructions not to destroy. It's like topless photos on a website vs hardcore pornography mailed to my door in FedEx-looking envelope.

    Furthermore, my point of "[Dems] never sent one to us" still stands, and that's my key problem with the RNC survey. We never asked for it. We're not on their mailing list or any that are similar. So why send this negative propaganda to my wife? And where's mine?

    By Blogger Sumocat, at 4/29/2010 06:42:00 AM
     

Post a Comment

<< Home




Archive

  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • October 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • January 2013
  • August 2012
  • June 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • December 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005