Tuesday, September 27, 2005


The debate over Intelligent Design theory has hit the legal battlefield, so I thought I'd post my thoughts on this. My stance breaks down into two basic positions: One, our design is not intelligent, and two, ID Theory explains nothing. ID theory is not an alternative to evolution; it is an alternative to science, which is fine in its own setting and contexts but not for a place of academia.

Not-so Intelligent Design 1


0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    Links to this post:

    Create a Link

    << Home




    Archive