Tuesday, August 02, 2005

Okay, in all fairness, the movers themselves were nice guys. They took good care of our stuff even though it is mostly cheap crap. However, they were three hours late, which really messed up my schedule. The rates were good and I was only charged the minimum travel time, but still I found All Awesome Movers to be less than awesome.

Less Than Awesome Movers


4 Comments:

  1. I would have to agree about a less than All Awesome move experience. My movers called and were close to ontime and were very nice but certainly weren't careful with my things. My desk was trashed and my very nice bed has a large scratch in it. Unfortunately, I signed off on the move before I found all these things. In this case, low prices meant low quality.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 8/03/2006 08:52:00 AM
     

  2. I have to disagree I had an amazing expereince with ALL AWESOME MOVERS, they didnt waste any of my time, the packers were amazing and fast. None of my things were mossing or scratched! I highly recommend this company, I myself have used them 3 times!!

    By Blogger Unknown, at 7/12/2007 09:59:00 PM
     

  3. For the posting on Tuesday, August 02, 2005
    I’d like to tell our customer that the delay happened because your job was a small job that was scheduled in the after noon and there was another job scheduled before yours and you agreed with the only opening that we had in the after noon, on the other hand I don’t see anything wrong with taking care of your stuff since we charged you the minimum. (You are paying the minimum anyway!)

    Asem Shalan
    Company manager

    By Blogger All Awesome Movers, at 8/13/2007 12:42:00 PM
     

  4. I understand delays, but three hours? You can't tell me that merits a grade of "awesome". Good (or "less than awesome") at best. Again though, the delay was the only problem. The moving guys did a good job and I gave them a solid tip. I had none of the issues described by anonymous on 8/3/06.

    By Blogger Sumocat, at 8/13/2007 12:59:00 PM
     

Post a Comment

<< Home




Archive

  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • October 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • January 2013
  • August 2012
  • June 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • December 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005